This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2024, 15, 230–241, doi:10.3762/bjnano.15.22
Figure 1: Principle of AFM tip morphology extraction from sharp structures.
Figure 2: Flowchart for the characterization of tip morphology using sharp structures.
Figure 3: Extraction of scan line feature points.
Figure 4: Simulated tip scanning of samples in tapping mode. (a) Blunt tip, (b) sharp tip, (c, d) sharp struc...
Figure 5: AFM scan images of the TipCheck sample. (a) 2D topography image and (b) 3D topography image.
Figure 6: Extraction of scan line feature points.
Figure 7: SEM images of AFM tips. (a) Image of tip and cantilever beam and (b) image of the tip; the dotted f...
Figure 8: Reconstructed probe model. (a) Reconstructed 3D model of the tip and (b) reconstructed probe contou...
Figure 9: Changes of the ETD determined with AFM and SEM.
Figure 10: Wear test procedure. (a) 3D reconstruction of the tip topography with the TipCheck sample before sc...
Figure 11: Influence of free amplitude on ETD and Ra. (a) ETD changes at free amplitudes of 200, 250, and 300 ...
Figure 12: Influence of the scanning frequency on ETD and Ra. (a) ETD changes at line scanning frequencies of ...
Figure 13: Influence of set point on ETD and Ra. (a) ETD changes at set points of 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8. (b) Ra ch...
Figure 14: AFM image changes under different scanning parameters. (a) 0 h scan with low-wear settings, (b) 5 h...